- Thread starter
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2011
- Messages
- 18,967
- Reaction score
- 460
Baltimore, Cincinnati, Cleveland, or Pittsburgh?
Since 1999 (so past 13 years), and the defending Super Bowl champion hasn't won a playoff game in the following season since '06Teagz said:Yep, plus the last 11 years or something, 1 of the 2 teams that played in the SB hasn't made it back to the Playoffs the next year. And don't see San Fran missing lol
yeaTeagz said:Steelers had a hell of a draft too.
RunRickyRun said:Cincy 11-5
Pittsburg 10-6
B'more 8-8
Brownies 5-11
Finally the Bungals year! Love the added TE via draft to a team already enjoying a solid game through the air. PIttsburgh is on the down and Baltimore just lost 11 or so starters from a year ago.
I see a pattern here....bosoxlover12 said:How is Pittsburgh on the down? They had half their starters injured at some point (QB, RB, LT, C, RG, RT, ILB, SS, FS)
They had CB depth so losing Keenan wasn't terrible. Got Jarvis to replace an aging Harrison. Everyone is healthy.
And tbh, losing Wallace was a good thing imo. One of the least intelligent players in the NFL in terms of route running, and in terms of big plays, I see no reason Wheaton can't do that same stuff. Gives more of a focus to Brown and Sanders, both whom I'd rather have over Wallace. And if the Steelers throw the ball less, is it really a bad thing? They became too pass reliant, and the Steelers have always been a grind it up run team.
Steelers are back
elcheato said:Whoa, it's been a while. Whats up dude?
Of courseWHO-DEY-BENGALS_14_18 said:
Yeah, it's been a bit. Anytime I can't remember my username/password to log in, it's been a bit. Had to come back just in time for football season so you guys could hear me complain, also have to hear all of your great wisdom. Definitely can't go without that for long. Haha