AL/NL ROY

Elite

PND SZN
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
18,915
Reaction score
1,162
ERA is too misleading.
FIP is a better judge. same with xFIP


ERA has too many variables
say a pitcher in Oakland has a 2.3 ERA. he has a huge advantage of all that foul ground and just an overall huge park
say a pitcher has an ERA of 2.3 in Colorado. way more impressive considering that ballpark

FIP is things a pitcher can control. Walks, Strikeouts, Homers. once a hitter puts the ball in play, it's up to the defense

Justin's FIP is 2.73
Weav's FIP is 2.80



tons of other stats suggest Justin over Weav.
i didnt even go into xFIP or Ground ball percentage etc

but even looking beyond SABR. Verlander has WAY more K's
has 1 more walk in about 20 more innings
a 2.28 ERA isnt something to dismiss either if youre going to look at ERA
I'm telling you right now who the voters are going to vote for.

I never brought up who I thought deserved it.
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
I think Morrow is top 3 in fip :D

Do the voters even look at sabermetrics though?
no, but even so, Verlander is better

like 50 more Ks
14 more innings
his 2.28 ERA is micro enough to offset Weavs little ERA
1 more walk in 14 more innings
lower WHIP
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
I'm telling you right now who the voters are going to vote for.

I never brought up who I thought deserved it.
Clemens had a 1.87 ERA and came in 3rd

Verlander has it locked up. it'll be unanimous
 

Rios15

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
21,759
Reaction score
256
I'm telling you right now who the voters are going to vote for.

I never brought up who I thought deserved it.
I don't see how the voters can vote for Weaver when he only beats him in ERA by a few points.
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
ERA is too misleading.
FIP is a better judge. same with xFIP


ERA has too many variables
say a pitcher in Oakland has a 2.3 ERA. he has a huge advantage of all that foul ground and just an overall huge park
say a pitcher has an ERA of 2.3 in Colorado. way more impressive considering that ballpark

FIP is things a pitcher can control. Walks, Strikeouts, Homers. once a hitter puts the ball in play, it's up to the defense

Justin's FIP is 2.73
Weav's FIP is 2.80



tons of other stats suggest Justin over Weav.
i didnt even go into xFIP or Ground ball percentage etc

but even looking beyond SABR. Verlander has WAY more K's
has 1 more walk in about 20 more innings
a 2.28 ERA isnt something to dismiss either if youre going to look at ERA
How many voters do you expect to look up the common xFIP stat?
 

Elite

PND SZN
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
18,915
Reaction score
1,162
Clemens had a 1.87 ERA and came in 3rd

Verlander has it locked up. it'll be unanimous
Clemens also had a 13-8 W-L record while Carp had a 21-5.

Clemens also had a sub-2 ERA in 1990 but Bob Welsch had 27 wins.
 

Yankees2772

RIP Derek Boogaard
Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
18,978
Reaction score
645
Bleach, sig bet that Verlander wins baring a complete meltdown?
 

Elite

PND SZN
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
18,915
Reaction score
1,162
My sig space is already taken up whenever Bengals finally gets around to it
 

Yankees2772

RIP Derek Boogaard
Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
18,978
Reaction score
645
In regards to the actual topic:

AL = Mark Trumbo
NL = Craig Kimbrel

Maybe Hellickson if he gets his ERA under 3, but Trumbo's counting stats are too high for voters to look past especially in a weak year for rookie hitters.
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
ew Mark Trumbo and his .295 OBP?

Pineda has been better than Hellickson as well
 

The Guid

The Guid abides
Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,895
Reaction score
214
You're too hung up on OBP. Yes, it's a good evaluator but it isn't the only thing. Trumbo is putting up good offensive numbers, as Yanks said, in a weak year for rookie hitters, in the Angels' mediocre offense. That counts for something.

And no, Pineda isn't pitching better than Hellickson. They're pretty even actually.
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
im not really against Trumbo because AL rookie hitters are meh like you guys said
im being a dick because i hate the Angels :p
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
and Pineda has been better than Hellickson overall
 

The Guid

The Guid abides
Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,895
Reaction score
214
Again, no lol

The differences between them are small percentages.
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
Again, no lol

The differences between them are small percentages.
Hellickson has a very nice ERA, and Pineda's is good as well, but Pineda has a better FIP and xFIP by a pretty good margin
Pineda has a better K/9
Pineda has almost 50 more K's in 2 less innings
Pineda has a better WHIP, better BA against, less walks

i give him the nod

sure, Hellickson pitches in the ALE, but Pineda has pitched against the ALE 7 times and Hellickson 9 times

Pineda is worth a full win more as well
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top