Joe Johnson's Contract

[The Young One]

Joe Johnson's contract: 6 years...for 119 million

Vote away

 

[RipCity32]

No sir. lol.

No way he should be paid more than LeBron and D-Wade lol..

 

[Pugz]

no. but for that team, yes. but ask me for the teams sake in another three years...hell no

 

[VC15]

The only 2010 FA signing that was worse than this, was the Travis Outlaw signing...

 

[The Young One]

4-0 stunna.....

But Im hating <_<

 

[$tunna]

Lol I'm 17 yrs old the heck I look like actually caring about a poll when this dude ain't even finished ONE year of the contract lol. Comedy swag.

 

[The Young One]

When Rashard Lewis signed his deal..we didnt need one year to know it was a <Censored>ty deal either.

 

[$tunna]

When has Rashard Lewis EVER been a number one option on an NBA team?

 

[CameronCrazy06]

Monetarily, Joe Johnson is not worth the Max. But the Hawks would SUCK without him and if that's the only way they could bring him back, so be it.

HOWEVER, I don't see the point of the Hawks bringing him back without upgrading anywhere else. Their lineup now isn't a championship contender, so why pay someone the max just to compete for 4th in the East every year?

 

[Rios15]

Monetarily, Joe Johnson is not worth the Max. But the Hawks would SUCK without him and if that's the only way they could bring him back, so be it.

HOWEVER, I don't see the point of the Hawks bringing him back without upgrading anywhere else. Their lineup now isn't a championship contender, so why pay someone the max just to compete for 4th in the East every year?

That's why I would say it's a bad deal. If they made a run in Free Agency at someone who could REALLY bring the team farther in the playoffs, or a higher seed, that would obviously be a better option. But then it may not be smart to take a chance like that. I'm not even sure if they would have the space to begin with.

 

[DJT]

I said yes, sure they probably could of locked him up for a little less, but they wanted him to know that he was their guy. And he IS their guy. I have no problems with this deal. But it probably would of been wiser to sign him to less money, so they would have room to re-sign Crawford.