Jags Garrard is Week One Starter

Status
Not open for further replies.

TTN2810

New Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
10,522
Reaction score
211
via ESPN
Jack Del Rio has all but confirmed that David Garrard will be the team's starter on opening day, saying the lockout cost Blaine Gabbert any chance he might have had to win a quarterback competition.
Kam won't be happy lolol.
 

Hurricane Season

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
27,130
Reaction score
1,228
Really shouldn't be a shock though. There aren't many rookie QB's that are ready by week one of their first year... let alone one that has yet to even step foot into training camp.
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
via ESPN

Kam won't be happy lolol.
ESPN twisted it, he said the Odds are against Gabbert, not that Garrard is going to start.

However Gabbert will still have a chance to win the starting Job. Hes one of the best self learners in the class and has already learned the whole playbook and Garrard/Luke McCown has helped him install most of it with the team. Gabbert will be fine.


If Gabbert takes the Starting Job from Garrard with this limited time, wow. Watch out.
 

TTN2810

New Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
10,522
Reaction score
211
Well he did say:

"I mean, I guess I could give you a book of Chinese, and a translation book of Chinese, and then see how you are in a month and if you can speak Chinese or not," Del Rio said. "That's what I equate it to." (Speaking about Gabbert learning the offense in a few weeks)

That is pretty black and white.
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
Well he did say:

"I mean, I guess I could give you a book of Chinese, and a translation book of Chinese, and then see how you are in a month and if you can speak Chinese or not," Del Rio said. "That's what I equate it to." (Speaking about Gabbert learning the offense in a few weeks)

That is pretty black and white.

Its coachtalk.

Koetter already broke down everything.

Gabbert and Garrard are splitting reps in traning camp. Whoever wins, wins. Garrard isn't penciled in as the week one starter.
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=lc-carpenter_memory_improves_gabbert_stock_041911

Like I said.

Gabbert is one of the smartest in the draft this year.. and has a photographic memory.

Some people have been able to teach themselves other languages on their own. Doesn't mean shit.
 

Mooche

New Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
9,904
Reaction score
247
Garrard should be the opening day starter anyways.. Gabbert with a transition in the league after being able to watch some action is much better for his progression in the long run I truly believe.
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
Garrard should be the opening day starter anyways..
Not really.

The best way for a rookie to learn is what? Throw him out there..

Hes not gonna learn shit by watching Garrard sack this team.
 

Mooche

New Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
9,904
Reaction score
247
Throwing the kid out there early on and watching him take a pounding isn't exactly good for him. The only reason why it might be OK to do is if MJD is fully healthy like the reports say. The running game and big target in Marcedes is key for Gab -- but I'd still let him sit for at least a few games.
 

TTN2810

New Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
10,522
Reaction score
211
Sometimes throwing them out there is good sometimes it crushes confidence.
I'd let him sit until about week 5 so he ca learn, when the season is still salvageable. They'll probably be like 2-3 with Garrard at that point.

Kam, you saying he has a photographic memory doesn't mean anything.
Okay great, he remembers the plays. But they plays are 10% of what he needs to learn. Most of what he needs to learn is in practice taking reps.
 

Mooche

New Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
9,904
Reaction score
247
Sometimes throwing them out there is good sometimes it crushes confidence.
I'd let him sit until about week 5 so he ca learn, when the season is still salvageable. They'll probably be like 2-3 with Garrard at that point.

Kam, you saying he has a photographic memory doesn't mean anything.
Okay great, he remembers the plays. But they plays are 10% of what he needs to learn. Most of what he needs to learn is in practice taking reps.

Really has nothing to do with anything in the grand scheme of things. It's wicked he can recite the plays like clockwork and know the assignments, but he has to go out there and execute them. If he knows that guy is running a post but he can't hit it, who gives a fuck?
 

TTN2810

New Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
10,522
Reaction score
211
I'm more worried about the hidden blitzes he has to pick up, along with complex defenses. For any rookie QB really, even Locker.
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
Throwing the kid out there early on and watching him take a pounding isn't exactly good for him. The only reason why it might be OK to do is if MJD is fully healthy like the reports say. The running game and big target in Marcedes is key for Gab -- but I'd still let him sit for at least a few games.
MJD 100% or not is still going to have the same effect.. Still going to put players in the box.

Mike Thomas is a target along with Jason Hill and Jarrett Dillard

Sometimes throwing them out there is good sometimes it crushes confidence.
I'd let him sit until about week 5 so he ca learn, when the season is still salvageable. They'll probably be like 2-3 with Garrard at that point.

Kam, you saying he has a photographic memory doesn't mean anything.
Okay great, he remembers the plays. But they plays are 10% of what he needs to learn. Most of what he needs to learn is in practice taking reps.

Peyton Manning is the only QB in the NFL right now with the same type of memory. Doesn't mean I'm comparing the two but we drafted Gabbert to start, not to sit. Everybody says Arod and Rivers sat.. well they was behind Brees and Favre.. Gabbert is behind Garrard.

Really has nothing to do with anything in the grand scheme of things. It's wicked he can recite the plays like clockwork and know the assignments, but he has to go out there and execute them. If he knows that guy is running a post but he can't hit it, who gives a fuck?
Hasn't nobody been able to get in there. Garrard is in the same cup as Gabbert right now. Koetter is running the offense this year instead of Del Rio calling the plays. So yeah. Different plays and shit.

I'm more worried about the hidden blitzes he has to pick up, along with complex defenses. For any rookie QB really, even Locker.
Every QB is going to have to go through it. If you're scared to play the QB you drafted to be your Franchise QB.. then you made the wrong pick.
 

DJT

Members
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
27,415
Reaction score
302
Rookie QBs gotta earn their spot, no surprise here.
 

TTN2810

New Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
10,522
Reaction score
211
Every QB is going to have to go through it. If you're scared to play the QB you drafted to be your Franchise QB.. then you made the wrong pick.
I'm not scared to play him, I want to make sure he's ready, so he doesn't lose confidence.
Lets put it this way:
Bradford, played great for a rookie, and Gabbert would have a similar offense around him, with AVG receivers and a great running game.
The only difference is, Bradford, coming out of college was way more ready for the NFL than Gabbert, and he had a FULL off-season to prepare. Without the off-season, no way does Gabbert come in and do anything close to Bradford, and if you get anything less than Bradford did from Gabbert, Garrard is the man for the job. For now.
 

jonathanlambert33

P-ROBlem
Staff member
Global Moderator
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
31,524
Reaction score
876
23300d1155448732-david-carr-texans-vs-chiefs-crw_8163-copy2600.jpg
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
I'm not scared to play him, I want to make sure he's ready, so he doesn't lose confidence.
Lets put it this way:
Bradford, played great for a rookie, and Gabbert would have a similar offense around him, with AVG receivers and a great running game.
The only difference is, Bradford, coming out of college was way more ready for the NFL than Gabbert, and he had a FULL off-season to prepare. Without the off-season, no way does Gabbert come in and do anything close to Bradford, and if you get anything less than Bradford did from Gabbert, Garrard is the man for the job. For now.
What makes you think Bradford was more ready?

Coming from the same offense, Bradford was more injury prone.
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
Smart Post... The forum could use more intelligence and in depth talk like this.


Anyways..

David Carr was never a bad QB, in Houston they had no Oline, and when you take that many hits as a QB, it scared him for life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top