Mason Raymond

soty

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2009
Messages
132
Reaction score
2
Thoughts?
v1 - too much contrast


v2 - lowered contrast
 

mg91

Mr. Man Utd
Joined
Sep 29, 2009
Messages
2,468
Reaction score
5
V2 is a bit better but it looks a bit sharp man.

Looks a bit LQ as well.
 

soty

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2009
Messages
132
Reaction score
2
V2 is a bit better but it looks a bit sharp man.

Looks a bit LQ as well.
Thanks but I am confused of how it can be sharp and low quality at the same time? What is sharp and what is LQ? Not trying to sound like a jerk just seeing how, where I should improve. Thanks as always!
 

trewd

New Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
take out the stock that is over the sky. It makes the sig look real dirty
 

mg91

Mr. Man Utd
Joined
Sep 29, 2009
Messages
2,468
Reaction score
5
I don't know how GIMP works, but I assume you can add a sharpen layer... I don't really know how to explain it.

LQ = Low Quality, as in stock quality not waulity of work. Have you stretched any of the textures?
 

Rice18

I'm emotionally vested in me.
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
7,142
Reaction score
473
The 2V one is better.

I just dont like that Render behind the render.
 

Leggster

New Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2010
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Yeah V2 is an improvement but the duplicate render ruins the sig tbh, just looks lq
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top