Aroldis Chapman Trade Nixed Amid Domestic Violence Investigation

Giantmetfan07

Shocking The World
ADMIN
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
34,763
Reaction score
561
Gave up 2 prospects. More details soon.
 

bosoxlover12

We're Onto Cincinnati
ADMIN
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
36,768
Reaction score
1,153
"But you don't trade prospects for a closer!"

It's a good move for LA
 

Phil The Thrill

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
12,785
Reaction score
218
None of Uriad, Seager, or De Leon are involved. So thats definitely a plus
 

snipezo

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 26, 2009
Messages
29,592
Reaction score
474
Jansen and Chapman duo going to be buckwild.

Fuck.
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
bosoxlover12 said:
"But you don't trade prospects for a closer!"

It's a good move for LA
but you shouldn't, it's usually poor value. Trading valuable prospects for 60-80 innings is bad business
 

bosoxlover12

We're Onto Cincinnati
ADMIN
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
36,768
Reaction score
1,153
Prospects come and go, though, often with a high bust rate.
 
 
The amount of A-Tier prospects the Red Sox have had over the past 10 years is crazy. And these guys, like Anthony Ranaudo, Lars Anderson, Ryan Kalish, Drake Britton, etc, all proved to be not even really MLB level players, yet at the same time could have notched us serious talent in return.
 
 
Look at the Sox/Indians trade a few years back for Victor Martinez. It looked at the time the Indians won the deal, as they got a great young pitcher in Masterson, and a stud prospect in Hagadone (as well as a B/C tier prospect too). VMart wasn't a success really for Boston, as we didnt keep him that long, but Hagadone, the piece that we thought we might regret losing, was nothing special in the bigs. Decent middle reliever, but not someone you'd want in return as the main piece of the deal.
 
That's why you trade prospects away. The Sox have several top guys that are peaking at their prospect status right now, like Matt Barnes, Henry Owens, and Blake Swihart. You move those 3 in a deal, along with someone like Jackie Bradley, and you might be getting close to getting a talent like Chris Sale. Those prospects might be really good (Swihart is a great hitting catcher, and Owens looks filthy. Barnes is a flame thrower too), but they also might be the exact same as Ranaudo, who couldn't even make an MLB roster after being touted as the next Jon Lester.
 
 
Like, its great to have a good farm system. The Yankees right now are an example of why you need one. But if you have a plethora of talent, you can move them. Deven Marrero is an IF and is probably a B tier prospect. With X at shortstop, and Moncada/Pedroia locking down 2B, we don't need Marrero outside being a utility backup defender over the next 6 years. So go move him while his value isn't shit, and get a nice reliever in return
 

Giantmetfan07

Shocking The World
ADMIN
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
34,763
Reaction score
561
snipezo said:
Jansen and Chapman duo going to be buckwild.

Fuck.
Both in contract years. One of them ain't gonna be happy as set up.
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
bosoxlover12 said:
Prospects come and go, though, often with a high bust rate.
 
 
The amount of A-Tier prospects the Red Sox have had over the past 10 years is crazy. And these guys, like Anthony Ranaudo, Lars Anderson, Ryan Kalish, Drake Britton, etc, all proved to be not even really MLB level players, yet at the same time could have notched us serious talent in return.
 
 
Look at the Sox/Indians trade a few years back for Victor Martinez. It looked at the time the Indians won the deal, as they got a great young pitcher in Masterson, and a stud prospect in Hagadone (as well as a B/C tier prospect too). VMart wasn't a success really for Boston, as we didnt keep him that long, but Hagadone, the piece that we thought we might regret losing, was nothing special in the bigs. Decent middle reliever, but not someone you'd want in return as the main piece of the deal.
 
That's why you trade prospects away. The Sox have several top guys that are peaking at their prospect status right now, like Matt Barnes, Henry Owens, and Blake Swihart. You move those 3 in a deal, along with someone like Jackie Bradley, and you might be getting close to getting a talent like Chris Sale. Those prospects might be really good (Swihart is a great hitting catcher, and Owens looks filthy. Barnes is a flame thrower too), but they also might be the exact same as Ranaudo, who couldn't even make an MLB roster after being touted as the next Jon Lester.
 
 
Like, its great to have a good farm system. The Yankees right now are an example of why you need one. But if you have a plethora of talent, you can move them. Deven Marrero is an IF and is probably a B tier prospect. With X at shortstop, and Moncada/Pedroia locking down 2B, we don't need Marrero outside being a utility backup defender over the next 6 years. So go move him while his value isn't shit, and get a nice reliever in return
There is no issue with trading prospects, I'm not arguing that. If you need an impact player, I'm all for it. But, the way you're talking is just weird thinking. Just because you have a position of strength in your system doesn't mean you should trade that strength away for 50 cents on the dollar. 
 

cruzg24

It is what it is
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
21,184
Reaction score
209
Hopefully Chapman can serve as a big brother/mentor to Puig and get him back on track.

I like this deal because the bullpen was a significant problem for the Dodgers last year besides Kenley. If they lose Aroldis next year to FA at least they get a 1st round pick.
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
Of course
Friedman and zaidi bout to get thrifty

Jansen and chapman oh god yes
Bullpengasm
Best tandem ever
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
GMF1991 said:
Both in contract years. One of them ain't gonna be happy as set up.
then one of them could leave as a free agent
 

Phil The Thrill

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
12,785
Reaction score
218
Not so fast
 
2:13pm: The trade is not yet finished, according to MLB.com’s Mark Sheldon (links to Twitter). Not only that, but Sheldon hears that there are other clubs involved who could swoop in and acquire Chapman at the last minute.
 

Teagz

Dogs.
Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 1, 2011
Messages
18,967
Reaction score
460
I will take one Kenley Jansen please.
 

snipezo

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 26, 2009
Messages
29,592
Reaction score
474
GMF1991 said:
Both in contract years. One of them ain't gonna be happy as set up.
Relievers in general are also seeing huge raises. I don't see how being a set up for a year will hurt their chances of getting paid.
 

Giantmetfan07

Shocking The World
ADMIN
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
34,763
Reaction score
561
Wouldn't being a full-time closer maximize your value? 
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
Darren ODay and Ryan Madson and Joakim Soria just got paid and they werent closers

These two are better and will get larger contracts when they reach FA whether theyre closing or not
 

Giantmetfan07

Shocking The World
ADMIN
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
34,763
Reaction score
561
Agree to disagree. I think if being a full time closer one more year means the guy gets an extra $2-3M per year, he's going to want that. 
 
Regardless, it seems like the Reds pussied out of this trade. 
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top