Nash vs Kidd

[jonathanlambert33]

Nash is 37 and Kidd is 38.

This is tough for me, but I think Kidd is the better all around player. He actually plays defense.

 

[SaintFan25]

Nash for me. Not a good defensive player but he's much better on the offensive end imo.

 

[jonathanlambert33]

I think Kidd doesn't have as much of a scorers mentality as Nash. He could score if he wants too, but he'd rather get guys like Dirk and Terry the ball.

 

[RipCity32]

I'd give the edge to Nash.
Better passer and scorer.

 

[CameronCrazy06]

Nash easily. Whoever said Kidd plays defense... not really. He's just crafty.

 

[footballplaya52]

Chris Paul

 

[The Young One]

Kidd is a winner to me...

I wont choose one though

 

[Lake Louise]

I'll take Nash. They both seem to be ageless, but as said, Nash is a better passer and scorer. Kidd just has the better team around him, right now.

 

[bosoxlover12]

Nash vs Kidd: Who do you take RIGHT NOW

Right now I'd take Kidd, because he's in the Finals right now and Nash isn't

 

[bestkeptsecret13]

Right now I'd take Kidd, because he's in the Finals right now and Nash isn't

So if Jose Calderon was in the Finals, then he's better than both of them?

I think the Mavs might still be in the Finals with Nash as their PG over Kidd.

 

[Elite]

Right now I'd take Kidd, because he's in the Finals right now and Nash isn't

You're such an idiot.

By your logic, Joel Anthony > Dwight Howard.