Who Would Be Worse?

After Peyton Manning got injured this season, it has become obvious that the Colts suck, badly. Peyton is their team.

The same could be said about Brady. You could say "he has Welker, one of the best WRs in football". Welker was a nobody before joining NE. Deion showed in Seattle he sucks without Brady. Most of their receivers are Brady products, or at least it cannot be proven that they arent.

The scenario is, lets say, when Peyton got injured and out for the season, Brady did as well.


WHICH TEAM WOULD HAVE A BETTER 2011 RECORD AT THE END OF THE SEASON? NEW ENGLAND, OR INDY?

I'd say New England, but not by a ton. They do have the worst defense in the NFL and we all know that Brady has carried them to a lot of wins.

The Colts would be worse.
See: Matt Cassel.

I'd say the Colts, just because the Pats have Belichick.

elcheato said:

I'd say the Colts, just because the Pats have Belichick.

Click to expand...

Belichick is so fucking overhyped.

Over hyped or not, his system can work without Brady and he's a lot better then Caldwell.

They have Mallett to back him up. At least they have a backup plan in case he goes down, because it's happened before and they've still been a contender.

Patriots would be the better team.

For what it's worth, Cassel came in and got to the playoffs while the Patriots still had a D

World B. Guid said:

For what it's worth, Cassel came in and got to the playoffs while the Patriots still had a D

Click to expand...

Cassell threw for 3,700 yards and 21 TDs. Defense or no defense, they would have won and did win more games than the Colts are going to this year

Colts obviously. The Pats have good backup quaterbacks like Hoyer and Mallet while the Colts have Painter and Orlovszy. The Pats also have somewhat of a running game with BJGE and Woodhead.

Bleacher Creature. said:

Cassell threw for 3,700 yards and 21 TDs. Defense or no defense, they would have won and did win more games than the Colts are going to this year

Click to expand...

No doubt. And the o-line was playing better than it is (should be) now. It was just something to bear in mind hence the "for what it's worth".

Well, my response was to this question...

WHICH TEAM WOULD HAVE A BETTER 2011 RECORD AT THE END OF THE SEASON? NEW ENGLAND, OR INDY?


So I guess that means Indy would be worse and I voted for the wrong team. Lol