Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Marlins Have Agreed to Stanton Deals with Giants, Cardinals


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   GMF1991

GMF1991

    Shocking The World

  • Head Administrator
  • 33,499 posts
  • Location:'Merica

Posted 03 December 2017 - 03:10 PM

https://www.mlbtrade...rds-giants.html


The Marlins have agreed to the general framework of Giancarlo Stanton trades with both the Cardinals and the Giants, Jon Morosi of MLB.com reports (Twitter links). Whether a deal comes together will depend on Stantons willingness to waive his no-trade clause to join either club, which looks far from certain. In fact, Jim Bowden of SiriusXM tweets that the Dodgers are the only team hed agree to waive his no-trade rights for as of now. Bowden adds that the Giants would have a better chance than long shot Cardinals of landing Stanton if the Dodgers were to pass on acquiring him
  • 0

Ceap63JW4AA82v_.jpg


#2 OFFLINE   bosoxlover12

bosoxlover12

  • Global Moderator
  • 31,569 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 03:38 PM

Such a leak by the Marlins lol

 

Saying you've agreed to deals with two teams is literally just an effort to have Boston and LA try to up their offers


  • 0

1. Cavs
2. Chicago
3. Knicks
4. Toronto
5. Pacers
6. Boston
7. Bucks
8. Magic

 

^^lmfao


#3 OFFLINE   elcheato

elcheato

    Legend

  • Hall of Fame
  • 66,707 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 03:42 PM

It's literally an effort to push Stanton to accept a trade and move on


  • 0

1463678463-U12317.png


#4 OFFLINE   Father Pugzo

Father Pugzo

    #ForPaul

  • Hall of Fame
  • 120,882 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 03:43 PM

this is a pretty shady tactic.
  • 0


1469155149-U11810.png

1463678439-U12317.png


#5 OFFLINE   GMF1991

GMF1991

    Shocking The World

  • Head Administrator
  • 33,499 posts
  • Location:'Merica

Posted 03 December 2017 - 04:17 PM

Such a leak by the Marlins lol

 

Saying you've agreed to deals with two teams is literally just an effort to have Boston and LA try to up their offers

 

But he doesn't want to go to Boston. LA, yea, that makes sense. 


  • 0

Ceap63JW4AA82v_.jpg


#6 OFFLINE   bosoxlover12

bosoxlover12

  • Global Moderator
  • 31,569 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 04:22 PM

I dont want him in Boston either so im happy with this news. just still shady tactics


  • 0

1. Cavs
2. Chicago
3. Knicks
4. Toronto
5. Pacers
6. Boston
7. Bucks
8. Magic

 

^^lmfao


#7 OFFLINE   elcheato

elcheato

    Legend

  • Hall of Fame
  • 66,707 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 04:28 PM

They have a player only willing to accept a trade to one team right now, how is this shady? 


  • 0

1463678463-U12317.png


#8 OFFLINE   bosoxlover12

bosoxlover12

  • Global Moderator
  • 31,569 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 04:33 PM

sorry, shady wasnt the right word.

 

they didn't have to leak the two trades to the media for giancarlo to accept a deal. they could have told him that they had deals in place with san fran and st louis, and if he preferred one or the other. if stanton wanted to go to either, they just announce "Stanton agrees to deal with Giants" and we dont need to know about the done deal with the cards

 

but saying that they have accepted offers on the table from two teams, without having the trade actually accepted and processed, is pointless knowledge unless they are trying to get the red sox and dodgers to ante up. they didnt need to leak the two accepted deals is my point


  • 0

1. Cavs
2. Chicago
3. Knicks
4. Toronto
5. Pacers
6. Boston
7. Bucks
8. Magic

 

^^lmfao


#9 OFFLINE   elcheato

elcheato

    Legend

  • Hall of Fame
  • 66,707 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 04:39 PM

They're in a position with limited leverage right now. The Dodgers and Red Sox are likely offering shit, and they need to do whatever they can to maximize the value of an MVP candidate 


  • 0

1463678463-U12317.png


#10 OFFLINE   bosoxlover12

bosoxlover12

  • Global Moderator
  • 31,569 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 04:41 PM

thats literally what i said


  • 0

1. Cavs
2. Chicago
3. Knicks
4. Toronto
5. Pacers
6. Boston
7. Bucks
8. Magic

 

^^lmfao


#11 OFFLINE   elcheato

elcheato

    Legend

  • Hall of Fame
  • 66,707 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 04:45 PM

Your point is it was wrong to leak the trade options. How is trying to maximize value wrong, if that is the hill you're dying on here?

 

I think they'd happily send him to San Francisco for whatever was agreed upon, I stand by my original post of them just putting pressure on him to accept one of these deals so they can end this charade 


  • 0

1463678463-U12317.png


#12 OFFLINE   .ptt81

.ptt81

    Legend

  • Moderator
  • 12,391 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 06:13 PM

Yeah Boston is 100% out on Stanton and it appears on all accounts he's staying in the NL. So I'm not concerned at all. 

 

Has it actually been confirmed that the Dodgers actually have full blown interest in Stanton? He's really tying management's hands here.


  • 0

JBJ-12.03.13-PM.gif?b22247

 

WIN. DANCE. REPEAT.

 


#13 OFFLINE   Mexi

Mexi

    "What a guy. Wow. Amazing. Beautiful."

  • Hall of Fame
  • 51,771 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 08:02 PM

There is zero chance he leaves miami and turns down the giants for st. Louis lmao

Giants is so iffy cause they are worse off than miami right now and hed be losing money with state taxes

Dodgers or bust lmao
  • 0
lel

#14 OFFLINE   Mexi

Mexi

    "What a guy. Wow. Amazing. Beautiful."

  • Hall of Fame
  • 51,771 posts

Posted 03 December 2017 - 08:03 PM

Yeah Boston is 100% out on Stanton and it appears on all accounts he's staying in the NL. So I'm not concerned at all. 
 
Has it actually been confirmed that the Dodgers actually have full blown interest in Stanton? He's really tying management's hands here.

dodgers are focused on ohtani

My belief is once ohtani decides on a team we'll see what the dodgers do
  • 0
lel

#15 ONLINE   PWNdroia

PWNdroia

    Member

  • Members
  • 935 posts

Posted 04 December 2017 - 06:11 AM

Yeah Boston is 100% out on Stanton and it appears on all accounts he's staying in the NL. So I'm not concerned at all. 
 
Has it actually been confirmed that the Dodgers actually have full blown interest in Stanton? He's really tying management's hands here.

It's a shame. He'd be a great fit for Boston. You won't get the same production from JD Martinez or Jose Abreu.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic has been visited by 13 user(s)


    catman, Teagz, Mexi, .ptt81, The Guid, brett05, BrewCrewFan, BlackMamba, bosoxlover12, elcheato, Big Bid'Ness, GMF1991, lilbravesfan22

Social Media

Site Info